½Û×ÓÊÓÆµ

Home / De-Voil /Part V17 Customs duties /Division V17.3 Cases and tribunal decisions / C00017 John Amand v C & E Comrs (1996) unreported
Commentary

C00017 John Amand v C & E Comrs (1996) unreported

Part V17 Customs duties

Customs duty - jurisdiction - non-restoration of seized goods - no right of appeal against original decision - need for review before appeal - since appeal is against decision on review - FA 1994 ss 14, 15, 16

These are two applications by the Commissioners to strike out the appeals under Rule 6(1) of the VAT Tribunals Rules 1986 on the ground that on the facts as they stand at present no appeal lies to the Tribunal.

Both appeals are against decisions of the Commissioners dated 27 March 1996 refusing to restore orchid plants/bulbs seized from Jacques Amand Ltd. The goods subject to LON/76/7022 were condemned by Uxbridge Magistrates Court on 22 January 1996.

Under s 16 of the Finance Act 1994 an appeal lies to a Tribunal with respect to any decision of the Commissioners on a review under section 15, including a deemed decision. A review under s 15 follows on a review being required under section 14 by notice in writing

To continue reading
View the latest version of this document, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to Tolley+™ Research or register for a free trial

Web page updated on 17 Mar 2025 14:25