For an overview of the concept of reasonable excuse, see A4.568. Online filing and postal issues have given rise to many penalty disputes regarding reasonable excuse, and these commonly turn on the reliability of the evidence as to the primary facts.
There is potential for failure on both the part of HMRC and the taxpayer (and a third possibility of an agent's failure if one is engaged).
On the one hand, as discussed at A4.569, HMRC bears the burden of proving that the taxpayer defaulted on the obligation in question. HMRC may be able to discharge that burden, at least on a prima facie basis, by referring to their records.
HMRC must establish:
- Ìý
(a)ÌýÌýÌýÌý that it served the required notice1 giving rise to the filing or payment obligation in question, and
- Ìý
(b)ÌýÌýÌýÌý that the obligation was not met (for example, the return or payment was not made in time)
As to (a) above, if taxpayers say that they did not receive a notice, the Tribunal will consider 'rebuttal
To continue reading
View the latest version of this document, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to Tolley+™ Research or register for a free trial
Web page updated on 17 Mar 2025 14:30