½Û×ÓÊÓÆµ

Home / Simons-Taxes /Administration and compliance /Part A7 Money laundering and tax avoidance schemes /Division A7.4 Tax avoidance /Tax avoidance and HMRC's response to it / A7.403 The Judiciary's response to tax avoidance
Commentary

A7.403 The Judiciary's response to tax avoidance

Administration and compliance

The Ramsay principle, Tower MCashback and purposive construction of statute

'Substance over form' has been a long standing principle of accounting treatment under UK GAAP. Tax legislation however, often looks to the legal form of a transaction rather then looking at the substance behind it or behind a series of transactions to determine the overall result. The extent to which a court is entitled to disregard the legal form of the transaction and to have regard to the underlying substance has evolved over time. The problem is well put in the following extract from a judgment of Lord Greene:

'In dealing with income tax questions it frequently happens that there are two methods at least of achieving a particular financial result. If one of those methods is adopted tax will be payable. If the other method is adopted, tax will not be payable... The net result from the financial point of view is precisely the same in each case, but one method of achieving it attracts tax and the other method does not. There have been cases in the

To continue reading
View the latest version of this document, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to Tolley+™ Research or register for a free trial

Web page updated on 17 Mar 2025 15:17