Although a number of keys tests have been developed over time, the general rule remains that no deduction may be claimed in respect of expenditure which is capital rather than revenue in nature (but see B2.111 regarding certain capital expenditure which is allowed as a deduction under the cash basis for unincorporated businesses). This general principle has been applied in the context of a huge variety of costs, as highlighted by the cases described below.
Capital vs revenue—loans, investments and other finance related payments
In the Taylor1 case, a self-employed architect made a substantial loan to a building company for a year repayable at a premium and carrying a high rate of interest. He was subsequently appointed consultant to the company. The company failed and the loan had to be written off. The loss was not allowed. The Commissioners considered that the loan was a capital investment, and that it was not incurred wholly and exclusively for the taxpayer's profession.
In Stone & Temple2 a money-lending subsidiary company advanced money to an individual following
To continue reading
View the latest version of this document, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to Tolley+™ Research or register for a free trial
Web page updated on 17 Mar 2025 16:43