As described in E4.715A, an employee may not deduct the cost of ordinary commuting between home and a permanent workplace. It was felt that this rule was being nullified by certain structures involving employment intermediaries, where there is a single employment with multiple engagements at different workplaces, none of which could be classed as a permanent workplace in relation to the employment. From 2016/17, given certain conditions, each engagement must be treated as a separate employment for the purposes of the travel expenses rules, thus turning each workplace into a permanent workplace and denying relief for home to work travel expenses1.
The rule that each engagement must be treated as a separate employment for travel expenses purposes potentially applies whenever a worker personally provides services other than excluded services (that is, services provided wholly in the client's home2) and the contract for those services is not directly between the worker and the client (or a person connected with the client) but involves an intermediary3. This initial proposition is very wide, and includes
To continue reading
View the latest version of this document, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to Tolley+™ Research or register for a free trial
Web page updated on 17 Mar 2025 17:41