"I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. ½Û×ÓÊÓƵ is helping me make money."
ParrisWhittaker
Access all documents on Bailment
Bailment is the legal relationship whereby one person, the bailee, is voluntarily and knowingly in possession of goods belonging to another person, the bailor.
The legal relationship of bailment exists independently of any contract, and is created when the bailee voluntarily takes into custody goods that are the property of the bailor. The essential element common to all types of bailment is the duty of care and diligence for the safe keeping of the goods on the bailee which arises from his possession of the goods. Every bailee has the duty to take reasonable care of his bailor's goods, and not to convert them. To qualify as a bailment, the bailor must give up actual or constructive possession of specific chattel in question in favour of another person, the bailee, who may having actual or constructive possession of the chattel, may simply keep it or do certain things to it so as to return the same chattel in its original or changed form. For a large number of instances where the concept of bailment impinges on various areas of
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
This Practice Note provides an introduction to bailment, which is a large and complex topic.This Practice Note provides a working definition of bailment and practical tips. It discusses modern commercial bailment, how bailment is created, the bailor and bailee and obligations arising between them. Bailment under contract is outlined, together with limitation of liability and incorporation of terms in bailment contracts. Bailments arising in hire purchase agreements, pawn and pledge arrangements, the hospitality industry and international transport are briefly discussed. Non-contractual bailment is introduced and issues with mistaken deliveries and uncollected goods are outlined. Bailment disputes, remedies and actions against third parties are introduced. Tips in relation to pleading bailment are provided.Bailment definedBailments can arise in a very wide range of circumstances, making a precise definition of what constitutes bailment, and a comprehensive classification of types of bailment, difficult. Simplistically, possession (or custody) of goods is a form of interest in or rights over goods, which can be distinguished from the ownership of goods. A bailment arises when a ‘bailee’...
Aviation finance—aircraft finance leases There are two principal types of aircraft finance structure: • secured lending under which the lender lends money to the purchaser to buy the aircraft and the lender takes security over the aircraft, and • leasing which offers greater flexibility to financiers in many instances Difficulties with secured lending Secured loan structure Under a traditional secured loan structure, the lender will lend money to the prospective owner of the aircraft in order to finance its acquisition of the aircraft. In return for this money being made available, the lender will usually take first priority security by way of a mortgage over and in respect of the aircraft (see Practice Note: Taking security over aircraft in aviation finance transactions). Once the loan has been repaid in full, together with any other amounts owing under the transaction documents, the lender will release the aircraft from the mortgage with unencumbered title being returned to the borrower. If the borrower does not repay the loan or it defaults in...
Discover our 30 Practice Notes on Bailment
SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT (pursuant to part 26 of the companies act 2006 of great britain) between [insert name of company] and its Scheme creditors (as defined in the Scheme of Arrangement) Dated [insert date] 1 Definitions and Interpretation In the Scheme, unless the context otherwise requires or otherwise expressly provides, the following definitions apply: Act • means the Companies Act 2006 of Great Britain; Admissible Interest • means any interest provided for in a contract or any relevant statute or any other relevant law or judgment; Admitted Claim • means the balance, if any, calculated as remaining due from the Company to a Scheme Creditor pursuant to clause 10.1 following the application of set-off pursuant to clause 11.1; Agreed Claim • means the amount determined as being due from the Company in respect of a Scheme Creditor’s Claim pursuant to clause 8; Available Distributable Amount • means the amount available for payment by the Company to its Scheme Creditors pursuant to clause 13; Board • means the...
Part 26A restructuring plan (short form) (pursuant to part 26A of the companies act 2006) between [insert name of company] and its Creditors/Members (as defined in the Restructuring Plan) Dated [insert date] 1 Definitions and Interpretation In the Restructuring Plan, unless the context otherwise requires or otherwise expressly provides, the following definitions apply: Act • means the Companies Act 2006 of Great Britain; Admissible Interest • means any interest provided for in a contract or any relevant statute or any other relevant law or judgment; Admitted Claim • means the balance, if any, calculated as remaining due from the Company to a Creditor/Member pursuant to clause 12.1 following the application of set-off pursuant to clause 13.1; Agreed Claim • means the amount determined as being due from the Company in respect of a Creditor’s/Member’s Claim pursuant to clause 10; Available Distributable Amount • means the amount available for payment by the Company to its Creditors/Members pursuant to clause 15; Board • means the board of directors of the Company...
Dive into our 2 Precedents related to Bailment
Under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, where a bailee of goods serves notice on the bailor to collect the goods, failing which the bailee will sell them, can the bailee include the disputed costs of storage of the goods in the notice and what time period should the notice specify for the bailor to collect the goods? This Q&A covers bailment under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 (T(IG)A 1977), uncollected goods and T(IG)A 1977, s 12 and Sch 1. We have focussed on T(IG)A 1977, Sch 1. A bailee’s right to sell uncollected goods A bailee has a statutory right to sell goods entrusted to him in cases where a bailor is under an obligation to take delivery of the goods. The obligation is imposed by the bailee giving notice in writing to the bailor specifying the name and address of the bailee, giving particulars of the goods and the place where they are held, stating that the goods are ready for...
Would an equitable claim arise if a person, who is in possession of another's asset, incurs costs to upgrade the asset to be fit for purpose and seeks recovery of those costs from the owner? In answering this Q&A, we assume you are referring to a business to business transaction for the hire of goods which have not been supplied fit for purpose. We assume that any contract is silent on the requirement to make goods fit for purpose and on the issue of the recovery of costs incurred in doing so. We also assume that the possibility of any contractual claims has been separately considered. In conducting our research we have focused on the law of bailment. This appears to be a bailment issue from the limited information provided. There are various kinds of bailment and there may be contractual provisions for dealing with the current scenario faced; see commentary: Breach of bailment obligations: Halsbury's Laws of England. For further information, see Practice Note: Bailment. In...
See the 31 Q&As about Bailment
Commercial analysis: This was a case relating to items in 14 safety deposit boxes (SDBs) held at a London bank. Due to the passage of time, the Bank was no longer able to trace the owners of those items, which it now wished to sell. In relation to those goods which had been deposited after 1 January 1978, the court confirmed that these could be sold under sections 12–13 of the Torts (Interference of Goods) Act 1977 (T(IG)A 1977). In respect of goods deposited prior to that date, and which remained subject to general common law, the court was persuaded that the Bank could rely on the principle established in the case of Da Rocha-Afodu: namely, that given that it had done all that was right and reasonable to trace and notify the owners, it should be protected from any potential liability which might otherwise attach as a consequence of the sale. Written by Natasha King, barrister at 4 Pump Court.
This week's edition of Commercial weekly highlights includes: news of the Ukraine crisis implications for Commercial practitioners, analysis of the High Court decision in Addax Energy SA v Petro Trade Inc considering the basis for a jurisdiction clause in an oral agreement and the latest ASA rulings.
Read the latest 11 News articles on Bailment
**Trials are provided to all ½Û×ÓÊÓƵ content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ½Û×ÓÊÓƵ services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234