"In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product."
Harper Mcleod
Access all documents on Claimant
A person who brings a claim.
Rules governing the addition and substitution of parties to proceedings are found in CPR Rule 19.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
Drafting checklist for claim or response—unfair dismissal: redundancy Both parties • Was the Claimant an employee? See Practice Notes: Entitlement to claim unfair dismissal—Eligibility and Employee status • Did the Claimant have requisite qualifying service, or does an exception apply? See Practice Note: Qualifying period for unfair dismissal • Has the Claimant complied with the requirement for early conciliation or does one of the exemptions apply? See Practice Note: The early conciliation requirement • Is the claim brought within the three-month time limit, or the period as extended if the requirement for early conciliation applies? See Practice Notes: Unfair dismissal time limit and The early conciliation requirement—Extension to time limits (the 'stop the clock' provisions) • Is the contract of employment arguably void for illegality? See Practice Note: Entitlement to claim unfair dismissal—Illegality • Does the Claimant fall within a category of employee excluded from unfair dismissal protection, eg police constables. See Practice Note: Entitlement to claim unfair dismissal—Particular types of employment • Was the Claimant’s work based in Great...
Grounds for challenge in a public procurement process—checklist This Checklist examines the grounds for challenge in a public procurement process. Procurement challenges are restricted by time limits and bidders need to be aware of how to rectify any breaches as soon as possible. This Checklist sets out the limitation period under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), SI 2015/102 and the relevant factors that can affect the date this starts. This Checklist also pinpoints potential grounds for challenge in relation to Selection Questionnaires, invitations to tender and standstill letters. Limitation in public procurement proceedings Procurement challenges are subject to relatively short limitation periods. It is therefore important that bidders are alive to potential breaches arising during the procurement process itself. Where a breach occurs, an analysis as to what, if any, action the bidder wishes to take must be undertaken quickly. The courts have consistently held that a bidder that chooses to sit on its hands and await the outcome of the procurement process will not be able to...
Discover our 36 Checklists on Claimant
Employment claims in Scottish civil courts Scottish civil courts, like their counterparts in England and Wales, can and do decide certain employment disputes. However, there are very significant differences between the civil court systems in Scotland and in England and Wales which practitioners need to be aware of. This Practice Note provides an overview of: • the most common orders sought by employment lawyers in Scottish civil courts • the structure of the Scottish civil court system • the jurisdiction and key features of each relevant court • rights of audience • rules of procedure • important points about: ◦ breach of contract claims in Scotland ◦ injunctive (interlocutory) relief in Scotland ◦ dawn raids in Scotland ◦ industrial relations disputes in Scotland ◦ equality of terms claims in Scotland The purpose of this Practice Note is to provide an introduction to the key features of the Scottish civil court system for employment lawyers. It is not intended to and does not purport to be a comprehensive account of...
Preparing for the auditors—in-house lawyers One of the key dates in your organisation’s calendar is the date of the annual audit. An important part of the auditors’ role is to ensure that your organisation’s processes are fit for purpose. Central to that is your organisation’s approach to legal matters and legal risk. As an in-house lawyer, you need to prepare for the auditors’ visit because inevitably they will want to meet with you. While each audit firm has its own standard set of questions for in-house lawyers, the questions tend to follow certain themes, eg: • your risk register • litigation • applicable law and regulation • contracts • intellectual property (IP) • legal work process • your knowledge and experience Since joining your organisation, you have hopefully had the opportunity to meet with the key directors and heads of function. Those meetings will have given you the opportunity to find out more about many of the issues the auditors will be interested in. See Practice...
Discover our 648 Practice Notes on Claimant
Letter of instruction to single joint expert—employment tribunal proceedings Private & confidential [Insert name and address of expert] [Insert date] Dear [insert name of expert] [Insert case heading, eg Ms R Jones v Supermarkets Plc, ET Case Number: 12345] Instruction to act as single joint expert Thank you for agreeing to act as the expert witness in this matter. As you know you will be acting as a single joint expert. We act for [insert name of client] who is [bringing OR defending OR an employment tribunal claim against [insert name of opposing party/parties]. This letter has been countersigned by the solicitors acting on behalf of [insert name of opposing party/parties] to confirm their agreement to the terms of this letter. The aim of this letter is to provide you with the relevant factual background, key documents and to identify the issues you will need to consider. As an expert witness you will be aware of the need for you to comply with certain duties and ensure...
Application—amendment to claim or response [Insert date] [Insert] Employment Tribunal [insert address] To the [insert] Employment Tribunal [Insert case name] Case No: [Insert case number] Application under Rule 31(1) to amend the [Claim OR Response] We act for the [ Claimant OR Respondent] in the above matter. We wish to apply pursuant to Rule 31(1) for an order that we be permitted to amend the [Claim OR Response] in the form of the attached draft, as follows: [insert details, eg to include an additional paragraph 10A to read ‘The Claimant also contends that her dismissal amounts to direct sex discrimination under sections 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010’.] [We request that a hearing is listed to consider the details of this application. OR We request that this application is determined on the basis of written representations only so as to avoid the need for the parties to attend a hearing and incur the additional associated costs.] Our reasons for applying for...
Dive into our 625 Precedents related to Claimant
A litigant in person has filed a list of documents for disclosure but has not filed a disclosure statement. Does CPR 31.21 apply and is there an automatic sanction for failure to provide a disclosure statement? Can the litigant rely on the documents without permission from the court or have relief from the sanctions? Disclosure statement CPR 31.10 sets out the procedure for giving standard disclosure. This requires a party to make a list of documents in the relevant practice form (N265) which includes a disclosure statement (see the annex to CPR PD 31A). CPR 31.10(5) requires a list of documents to include a disclosure statement which should indicate the individual statements listed in CPR 31.10(6): • setting out the extent of the search undertaken to locate documents to be disclosed • certifying that the party giving disclosure understands the duty to disclose documents • certifying to the best of his knowledge he has carried out that duty Unless the parties have agreed in writing that...
Is a Part 20 defendant normally required to complete a directions questionnaire ‘DQ’ (Form N181), does this answer change if the claim would be fast track, but the Part 20 claim multi-track? If the notice of allocation sent to the claimant does not require budgets, disclosure discussion report etc, can you ignore and propose standard directions? Also, outside the disclosure pilot, can one use standard disclosure? In this Q&A, the defendant’s Part 20 claim is a counterclaim that has been made against a person other than the claimant under CPR 20.5. Is a Part 20 defendant required to file a directions questionnaire? CPR 20 deals with counterclaims and other additional claims by the defendant. CPR 20.3(2) sets out which of the Civil Procedure Rules do not apply to additional claims (which, as defined in CPR 20.2(2) includes counterclaims). Included in the rules that do not apply to additional claims is CPR 26, which sets out the requirement for the parties to file a directions questionnaire (DQ)....
See the 1041 Q&As about Claimant
Law360, London: Insurers are using allegations of fraud in a 'scattergun' approach in defending against personal injury claims, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) warned on 5 June 2025.
PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: The issue arose in an interim payment application in a clinical negligence claim as to how to value the capital cost of a property already purchased when the claimant’s life expectancy was relatively short (just over 12 years). The claimant contended that she should recover the full value of the capital cost, not least when she could otherwise have purchased a cheaper house but spent more on adaptations. The judge rejected this submission and applied a conventional Swift v Carpenter calculation, while noting that this approach may not provide full compensation to the claimant. Written by Robert Weir KC, barrister at Devereux Chambers.
Read the latest 1059 News articles on Claimant
**Trials are provided to all ½Û×ÓÊÓƵ content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ½Û×ÓÊÓƵ services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234