"We constantly have to look at our own supply chain and choose the best value and quality-focused solutions for our offices. That was really the genesis of our switch to ½Û×ÓÊÓÆµ."
Harper Mcleod
Access all documents on Confidentiality
Duty imposed in conduct whereby an individual and firm must keep clients' matters confidential.
Confidentiality can be overridden by client consent or if the law requires disclosure. Breach of this duty and making an unauthorised disclosure in any other circumstance is a disciplinary matter.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
Drafting a building contract/schedule of amendments—checklist Once the procurement route and form of building contract has been selected (see Practice Note: Choosing the right procurement method—construction projects) the employer should consider the following matters and incorporate the appropriate drafting in the building contract particulars and schedule of amendments. This Checklist assumes that the parties are using a standard form of building contract, such as a JCT form, and that the employer is proposing the first draft including the completed contract particulars and a schedule of amendments, which amends the standard terms. This list is not exhaustive, however, and there may be other project specific matters/risks that need to be taken into account: Contractual matters • Carry out due diligence on the contractor The employer needs to carry out due diligence on the contractor at the outset to determine whether its financial position is acceptable. Confirm the contractor’s company number and name at Companies House. • Obtain consultants’ details Confirm the full details of the consultants engaged by the employer; some...
Option agreements—acting for the buyer—checklist Call or put option? In a 'call' option the buyer will have control in that it may call for a transfer of the property. A 'put' option gives the seller control in that it can require the buyer to take a transfer of the property and therefore the buyer should be especially vigilant in ensuring that the terms for the transfer (particularly those relating to valuation and, if appropriate, insurance) are as favourable as possible. Seller's charges If the property is already mortgaged at the date of grant of the option agreement, there is a risk that the mortgagee may overreach the option by exercising its power of sale. Therefore ensure that the mortgagee either: • joins into the agreement (this is rare in practice), or • provides written consent to the granting of the option In either case, the mortgagee should confirm that if the buyer exercises the option it will acquire the property free from the charge or, if the mortgagee...
Discover our 174 Checklists on Confidentiality
Data protection impact assessments—flowchart This flowchart illustrates how to establish whether or not you need to conduct a data protection impact assessment (DPIA) in relation to a particular project, and how to conduct one if it is required. See also Precedents: Data protection impact assessment—DPIA and Data protection impact assessment—DPIA—short form, which is based on a template issued by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The ICO’s Data Protection Impact Assessments guidance sets out seven steps to conducting a DPIA, whereas the ICO’s Data protection impact assessments guidance sets out a nine-stage process, as shown above. The two processes are broadly the same but the latter is more intuitive and is adopted in this flowchart. Note 1: Identify the need for a DPIA If you have a data protection officer (DPO), ask them for advice. For further information, see Practice Note: How to complete a data protection impact assessment—DPIA—Who should conduct the DPIA? A DPIA is compulsory in the case of: • a systematic and extensive evaluation of personal aspects...
Evaluating a data subject access request—flowchart The UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) provides a number of rights for data subjects, including providing a right of access to their personal data. Data subjects can make a request to an organisation to exercise their right of access to their personal data (a data subject access request or DSAR) at any time and there are strict time limits for complying with requests made. See Practice Notes: • Data subject rights—access • How to handle data subject requests This Flowchart maps out a process for evaluating DSARs received under the UK GDPR. It reflects the requirements in the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018) together with guidance issued by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). It should be read in conjunction with Practice Note: How to handle data subject requests and Flowchart: Handling data subject requests—flowchart, which covers requirements common to all data subject requests under the UK GDPR. Note 1—notifying the data subject you...
Discover our 3 Flowcharts on Confidentiality
As noted in Practice Note: The duty of fidelity and fiduciary duties, the duty of fidelity implied into every contract of employment will generally prevent an employee from disclosing to third parties confidential information which comes to their knowledge during the course of their employment. In addition to this, certain very confidential information, generally known as trade secrets, will be protected by the equitable duty of confidence. These two duties have combined historically to determine the implied duty on an employee in relation to confidential information.The manner in which business information is categorised is therefore very important; while an employee will be under an implied duty not to disclose trade secrets and/or confidential information to third parties during employment, only the implied duty not to disclose trade secrets will continue after the employment ceases.An exception to this general rule is that the employee may be prevented from taking advantage, after their employment has ended, of a breach of the implied duty that occurred during their employment (see Practice Note: Springboard...
This Practice Note examines the practical issues that typically arise relating to an employment settlement agreement (formerly known as a compromise agreement). It also outlines the tax issues that are likely to be relevant, and refers to our related Practice Notes for further detail.For information on the legal requirements (ie the conditions regulating settlement agreements) that must be met in order for a settlement agreement to be binding and valid to settle statutory employment claims, see Practice Note: Settlement agreements in employment—legal requirements.Parties to the agreementIn the case of an individual employer, or a company employer with a simple corporate structure, the employer and the employee will be the parties to the settlement agreement and there will be no need to refer to third parties.However, it may be that the identity of the employer is not straightforward, eg in a more complex corporate structure where:•the employee works, or has worked, for other companies in the employer’s group eg on secondment•the employee performs their work for one company, but is paid...
Discover our 953 Practice Notes on Confidentiality
Letter of instruction to single joint expert—employment tribunal proceedings Private & confidential [Insert name and address of expert] [Insert date] Dear [insert name of expert] [Insert case heading, eg Ms R Jones v Supermarkets Plc, ET Case Number: 12345] Instruction to act as single joint expert Thank you for agreeing to act as the expert witness in this matter. As you know you will be acting as a single joint expert. We act for [insert name of client] who is [bringing OR defending OR an employment tribunal claim against [insert name of opposing party/parties]. This letter has been countersigned by the solicitors acting on behalf of [insert name of opposing party/parties] to confirm their agreement to the terms of this letter. The aim of this letter is to provide you with the relevant factual background, key documents and to identify the issues you will need to consider. As an expert witness you will be aware of the need for you to comply with certain duties and ensure...
Letter to lenders governing appointment of creditors’ committee To: The persons listed in Schedule 1 to this letter [insert names of Lenders] From: [insert name of solicitors for the Creditors' Committee or the name of the Chair] Date: [insert date] Appointment of Creditors' Committee We refer to the discussions at the meeting of creditors convened by [insert name of debtor company] (the Company) to discuss the proposed restructuring. 1 Definitions and interpretation 1.1 Definitions In this letter, unless otherwise provided: Business Day • means a day other than Saturday, Sunday and public holidays when clearing banks generally are open for business in London; Chair • means the Lender appointed to chair the Creditors' Committee under the Creditor's Committee Agreement; Commitment • means (a) any undrawn amount which a Lender has committed to make available to the Company (but excluding any undrawn uncommitted amounts); (b) the principal amount of a Lender's participation in any utilisation by the Company, in each case under the Finance Documents; Committee...
Dive into our 397 Precedents related to Confidentiality
Is it acceptable for a liquidator and the only creditor in an insolvency situation to be represented by the same solicitor? Or is this a conflict? Both insolvency practitioners (IPs) and solicitors are members of professions that are governed by separate ethics codes. Both IPs and solicitors, before accepting an appointment or an instruction, should carry out documented procedures to ensure that there would not be a conflict of interest or breach of their ethics code in accepting the appointment or instruction. The question does not specify whether the conflict concerned would be for the solicitor or the IP and although both issues are considered, this answer deals primarily with the IP and whether the IP would have a conflict of interest. The insolvency ethics code sets out a framework approach that is to be followed in all cases to establish whether there is a conflict of interest. The IP should first of all assess whether there are any threats to the fundamental principles of integrity,...
Where an agreement contains a confidentiality clause in favour of one party only, can the contractual relationship as a whole imply a common understanding of the confidential nature of the other party, notwithstanding the clause itself? Lexis+® UK Commercial carries a suite of content on confidentiality within the topic: Confidential information. Generally speaking, case law refers to information which (a) is confidential in nature, and (b) has originated or been disclosed in circumstances such that the recipient is under an obligation to keep it confidential. The question of whether an obligation of confidentiality arises will very much depend on the individual circumstances. For instance, the question of whether the fact that party B is a business partner could be classified as confidential information (thereby restricting party A’s ability to advertise this fact) would, in the absence of any oral or written contract, legislative requirement or other professional or common law duty of confidentiality, probably hinge on the circumstances in which they became a business partner. This...
See the 240 Q&As about Confidentiality
The minutes of the CPR Committee (CPRC) meeting of 9 May 2025 (conducted in a hybrid format at The Rolls Building (Royal Courts of Justice) and via video conference) cover a number of issues including digital markets regulation, statutory appeals, fixed recoverable costs, parole referrals, Welsh language provisions, and public engagement through a question forum.
Arbitration analysis: This case arises from the claimant’s application for interim injunctive reliefs (the ‘Application’) seeking, among others, to restrain the first defendant (‘Firm B’), including any of its branches from (i) acting for Corporation C in an ongoing arbitration against Corporation D (the ‘Second Arbitration’); and (ii) providing any confidential information from a previous arbitration between the Claimant and Corporation B (the ‘First Arbitration’), to Corporation C. In determining the Application, the Court considered the principles governing the grant of interim reliefs as established in American Cyanamid v Ethicon Ltd. The court also considered the boundaries of arbitral confidentiality by considering what documents and information the obligation of arbitral confidentiality covers, and the relevant exceptions to this obligation. The court concluded that the claimant was not entitled to the requested reliefs. After examining the claimant's allegations of breaches of arbitral confidentiality, the court found no breach, except for some limited settlement information from the First Arbitration. The court was also not persuaded that there was a real risk of...
Read the latest 221 News articles on Confidentiality
**Trials are provided to all ½Û×ÓÊÓÆµ content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ½Û×ÓÊÓÆµ services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234