Q&As

What is the difference between exchange of witness statements and service of witness statements in a court order (which doesn't specify exchange)?

read titleRead full title
Produced in partnership with Jonathan Edwards of Radcliffe Chambers
Published on: 28 July 2017
imgtext

Timing of service of witness statements

In some cases, the court orders that the parties serve witness statements at different times, so that one party’s evidence is in response to the other party’s evidence. This is more likely to be appropriate where there are no statements of case, because then one party may need to know the case to which it has to respond before it can determine what evidence is required from it. Cases involving sequential witness evidence need no further consideration for the purposes of this Q&A: each party is of course required to serve their own witness statement at the time provided for in the order.

In other cases, the court orders that the same timing should apply to both parties’ witness statements so that their evidence is simultaneous. The court may either provide that witness statements be ‘exchanged’ at a specified time on a specified date, or use wording such as ‘the parties

Jonathan Edwards
Jonathan Edwards

Barrister, Radcliffe Chambers


Jonathan Edwards practises at Radcliffe Chambers in Lincoln’s Inn. He specialises in contested probate, claims to trust and estate assets, claims for partnership and estate accounts, property litigation including landlord and tenant, and insolvency and commercial disputes.

He is regularly instructed to represent clients in the High Court and County Court, and has been instructed to assist with proceedings in Jersey. Cases in which he has acted include Taylor v Taylor [2017] EWHC 1080 (Ch) and Burki v Seventy Thirty Limited [2018] EWHC 2151 (QB).

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Popular documents