½Û×ÓÊÓÆµ

| Commentary

(d) Delayed discovery

| Commentary

It may be that the defendant is initially ignorant that what he is doing is causing a breach of the claimant's contract, but he may subsequently discover it. In that event it has been held that the defendant may be made liable for a continuing inducement, that is, for causing the breach of contract to be continued:

'Smithies v National Association of

To continue reading
Analyse the law and clarify obscure passages all within a practical context.